Back to MIPS Guides
MIPS Guides

MIPS readiness checklist for practices

MIPS readiness for the 2026 performance year should begin before data collection starts and continue through submission preparation in early 2027. Practices should review eligibility, reporting pathway, measure requirements, data completeness, EHR readiness, Improvement Activities documentation, Promoting Interoperability timing, and submission responsibilities before the year is too far underway. MIPS requirements, eligibility, and submission processes are governed by CMS/QPP rules and change by performance year. Always verify current details through official QPP/CMS resources.

10 min read
In this article
  1. 1Before the 2026 performance year begins
  2. 2Early 2026 readiness setup
  3. 3Mid-year 2026 review
  4. 4Final 90-day and 180-day readiness windows
  5. 5Approaching the 2027 submission window
  6. 6After submission and QPP feedback
  7. 72026 readiness summary checklist

MIPS readiness is not a one-time task. For the 2026 performance year, practices should build a year-round workflow that starts with eligibility review and ends with organized submission preparation. The strongest workflows confirm who is subject to MIPS, which reporting pathway applies, which measures are realistic, whether data completeness can be met, whether EHR reports are reliable, and whether documentation is available before submission begins. The 2026 performance year generally runs from January 1 through December 31, 2026. The QPP submission window for 2026 performance data opens in early 2027 and closes March 31, 2027. Practices should not wait until the submission window to discover missing documentation, weak measure capture, EHR report issues, or pathway mismatches.

Before the 2026 performance year begins

Before January 1, 2026, practices should establish the foundation for MIPS reporting. This includes eligibility review, reporting pathway selection, measure planning, EHR readiness, role assignment, and documentation standards.

  • Verify 2026 MIPS eligibility for each applicable clinician and TIN/NPI combination
  • Confirm whether the clinician or group is required to participate, opt-in eligible, voluntarily reporting, excluded, or participating through an Advanced APM pathway
  • Review the 2026 low-volume threshold: more than $90,000 in Medicare Part B covered professional services, more than 200 Medicare Part B patients, and more than 200 covered professional services
  • Confirm whether reporting will be individual, group, subgroup, virtual group, or APM Entity
  • Decide whether Traditional MIPS, MVP, APP, or another applicable pathway will be reviewed
  • Review the 2026 standard category weights: Quality 30%, Cost 30%, Improvement Activities 15%, and Promoting Interoperability 25%
  • Review the 2026 performance threshold of 75 points
  • Select quality measures that match specialty, patient population, denominator volume, and documentation workflows
  • Confirm whether the practice needs 6 Traditional MIPS quality measures or 4 MVP quality measures from the selected MVP
  • Confirm each selected quality measure can meet 75% data completeness
  • Review whether Promoting Interoperability applies, may be reweighted, or requires a hardship exception review
  • Confirm CEHRT status and EHR reporting capability before the performance year begins
  • Assign internal ownership for eligibility, Quality, Improvement Activities, Promoting Interoperability, Cost awareness, and submission preparation

Eligibility should not be assumed based on prior-year participation. A clinician may have different eligibility status under different TIN/NPI combinations, and final eligibility should be verified through official QPP resources.

Early 2026 readiness setup

Once the 2026 performance year begins, the focus should shift from planning to operational setup. The goal is to make sure documentation, EHR capture, denominator tracking, and performance monitoring are working before too much of the year has passed.

  • Confirm that quality measure denominator events are being captured correctly from the start of the year
  • Confirm numerator actions are documented in the correct structured fields or supported documentation locations
  • Build a tracking workflow for denominator, numerator, exclusions, exceptions, case minimum, benchmark status, and data completeness
  • Monitor 75% data completeness for each selected quality measure
  • Start monthly or quarterly performance reviews instead of waiting until year-end
  • Select the required number of Improvement Activities based on reporting pathway, practice size, and applicable QPP status
  • Confirm that individual Improvement Activities are no longer assigned high or medium weights beginning with the 2025 performance period
  • Confirm Improvement Activities documentation requirements before the 90-day activity period begins
  • Review PI measure setup, exclusions, attestations, CEHRT status, and security risk analysis documentation
  • Confirm who will validate EHR reports before submission preparation
  • Confirm access to the selected submission pathway and responsible party

Mid-year 2026 review

A mid-year review helps identify data gaps, documentation issues, workflow problems, and reporting pathway concerns while there is still time to correct them. This review should be more than a performance score check. It should confirm whether the practice is capturing the right patients, documenting the right actions, and meeting the right 2026 QPP requirements.

  • Recheck 2026 QPP eligibility and reporting pathway assumptions
  • Review whether the practice is still using the correct Traditional MIPS, MVP, APP, or other applicable pathway
  • Confirm whether MVP registration is required and whether the April 1 to November 30, 2026 registration window applies
  • Review quality measure denominator volume, numerator performance, exclusions, exceptions, case minimum, and benchmark availability
  • Confirm each selected quality measure is still on track for 75% data completeness
  • Identify providers, locations, visit types, or workflows causing missing numerator documentation
  • Confirm Improvement Activities have either been completed for the required 90-day period or are scheduled with enough time remaining
  • Confirm Promoting Interoperability has started or will start early enough to meet the 180 continuous day requirement
  • Note that July 5, 2026 is the last day to start a 180-day PI performance period that runs through December 31, 2026
  • Review whether PI reweighting, exclusions, hardship exceptions, or special status considerations may apply
  • Review Cost category exposure, even though Cost is generally calculated from Medicare administrative claims
  • Document mid-year findings, workflow corrections, and responsible owners

Final 90-day and 180-day readiness windows

Some MIPS requirements depend on minimum performance periods. Practices should not wait until late in the year to confirm these windows.

  • Quality generally runs for the full 12-month performance period from January 1 through December 31, 2026
  • Improvement Activities generally require a continuous 90-day performance period unless the activity description states otherwise
  • October 3, 2026 is the last day to begin a continuous 90-day Improvement Activities period that runs through December 31, 2026
  • Promoting Interoperability generally requires at least 180 continuous days of CEHRT data during calendar year 2026
  • July 5, 2026 is the last day to begin a 180-day PI period that runs through December 31, 2026
  • Practices should validate EHR reports, PI attestations, security risk analysis documentation, and activity documentation before these windows close

If these windows are missed, the issue may not be fixable during submission preparation. That is why readiness should be monitored throughout the year.

Approaching the 2027 submission window

After the 2026 performance year ends, the focus shifts to validating data, organizing documentation, confirming completeness, and preparing the final submission through the practice's selected reporting pathway.

  • Confirm the QPP submission window dates for 2026 performance data
  • Treat March 31, 2027 as the final submission deadline unless official QPP guidance changes
  • Confirm the selected reporting pathway and reporting level before submission preparation is finalized
  • Confirm whether the practice is submitting as an individual, group, subgroup, virtual group, or APM Entity
  • Validate quality measure numerator, denominator, exclusions, exceptions, case minimum, benchmark status, and data completeness
  • Confirm each submitted quality measure meets the 75% data completeness requirement
  • Confirm Improvement Activities were completed and documented for the required continuous 90-day period
  • Confirm PI reports, exclusions, required attestations, security risk analysis documentation, and CEHRT information
  • Confirm whether Cost is expected to be scored or reweighted
  • Confirm access to the submission platform or selected reporting pathway
  • Allow enough time for review before the deadline
  • Keep copies of submitted data, confirmation records, and supporting documentation

After submission and QPP feedback

Submission is not the end of the MIPS readiness cycle. After the submission window closes, practices should retain documentation, monitor official QPP feedback, review final scores when available, and use lessons learned to improve the next performance year.

  • Save submission confirmations and supporting documentation
  • Monitor official QPP communications for final score and feedback release
  • Review final performance feedback when it becomes available
  • Compare final category results against internal expectations
  • Review whether any scoring issue may require targeted review within the applicable QPP timeline
  • Evaluate whether measure selection, documentation workflows, EHR configuration, or reporting pathway decisions should change for the next year
  • Begin next-year eligibility review when QPP updates become available
  • Document lessons learned for the next performance year

2026 readiness summary checklist

  • Verify 2026 MIPS eligibility for each applicable clinician and TIN/NPI combination
  • Confirm low-volume threshold status using allowed charges, Medicare Part B patient count, and covered services
  • Confirm whether the practice is required to participate, opt-in eligible, voluntarily reporting, excluded, or participating through an Advanced APM pathway
  • Confirm reporting level: individual, group, subgroup, virtual group, or APM Entity
  • Select the applicable reporting path: Traditional MIPS, MVP, APP, or another applicable pathway
  • If reporting an MVP, confirm MVP registration during the April 1 to November 30, 2026 registration window
  • Review 2026 category weights and whether reweighting may apply
  • Review the 2026 performance threshold of 75 points
  • Select quality measures that fit specialty, patient population, EHR capability, and documentation workflows
  • Confirm whether the pathway requires 6 Traditional MIPS quality measures or 4 MVP quality measures
  • Confirm each quality measure can meet 75% data completeness
  • Validate quality denominator and numerator capture early in the year
  • Select the required number of Improvement Activities based on reporting pathway, practice size, and applicable QPP status
  • Complete and document Improvement Activities for the required continuous 90-day period without relying on high-weight or medium-weight activity combinations
  • Confirm PI readiness before starting the required 180 continuous day period
  • Verify CEHRT status, PI measure setup, exclusions, attestations, and security risk analysis documentation
  • Review whether PI reweighting or hardship exception considerations may apply
  • Review Cost category exposure and whether applicable cost measures may be attributed
  • Conduct at least one mid-year performance and documentation review
  • Conduct a final pre-submission review before the 2027 submission window
  • Keep submission confirmations and supporting documentation organized
  • Review QPP final score and feedback when available
OrvexHealth Support

How OrvexHealth can help

OrvexHealth supports practices by helping organize 2026 MIPS readiness across eligibility review, reporting pathway planning, quality measure selection, documentation review, data completeness tracking, Improvement Activities documentation, Promoting Interoperability readiness, Cost awareness, and submission preparation through the practice's selected reporting pathway.

  • 2026 eligibility and TIN/NPI readiness review support
  • Traditional MIPS, MVP, APP, and reporting pathway planning support
  • Quality measure selection support based on specialty, patient population, denominator logic, and documentation workflows
  • Data completeness and documentation gap review
  • Improvement Activities planning and documentation organization
  • Promoting Interoperability readiness review with EHR workflow considerations
  • Cost category awareness based on claims-based scoring considerations
  • Mid-year and pre-submission readiness review support
  • Submission preparation support through the practice's selected reporting pathway

Compliance note: Compliance note: MIPS eligibility, scoring, category weights, reporting options, reporting requirements, submission methods, reweighting rules, performance thresholds, payment adjustments, and final outcomes are governed by CMS/QPP rules and may change by performance year. OrvexHealth provides consulting, readiness, workflow, and preparation support. We do not guarantee eligibility status, final score, payment adjustments, incentive outcomes, or avoidance of negative payment adjustments.

OrvexHealth
Schedule your assessment

Need help applying these insights
to your practice?

Book a complimentary practice assessment and we'll review where your revenue cycle, patient access, documentation, compliance readiness, staffing, and growth workflows can improve.

  • Complimentary assessment
  • No obligation
  • Response within one business day